A Decade of Decline: Confronting Auckland’s Dog Control Crisis Using Auckland Council Data

Author
Affiliation

University of Auckland

Published

April 13, 2026

Other Formats
Abstract
A spate of fatal dog attacks have focussed attention on New Zealand’s growing problem with roaming and aggressive dogs. Under the Dog Control Act 1996, Territorial Authorities are resposible for managing the harms associated with dogs in communities. Auckland Council’s Animal Management division publishes selected high-level statistics related to it’s dog control practices, but an examination of the underlying raw data in combination with data from it’s annual reports reveals troubling trends for some of the most important metrics. The rate of attacks, impounds, and euthanasia of impounded dogs are all increasing due to an explosion in the dog population and a stretched shelter system. Attack rates are highest in South Auckland, and several breeds are over-represented in negative statistics.
Keywords

dog control, dog attacks, Auckland, euthanasia

1 Key Points

Over the last 10 years:

  • Auckland’s dog population has increased by 14.5%.
  • Registration and desexing rates have fallen.
  • The proportion of ‘menacing’ dogs has doubled to 1 in 20.
  • Dog attack rates have almost doubled to 10 attacks for every 1,000 dogs.
  • Over half of impounded dogs are euthanised due to their temperament and full shelters.
  • Pit Bull type breeds are over-represented in attacks and impounds.
  • South Auckland has lower rates of registration and desexing, and higher rates of attacks and impounds.

2 Introduction

Four fatal dog attacks in New Zealand in the last four years have highlighted the increase in roaming and aggressive dogs in communities across the country.

  • Neville Thomson was killed in Katikati in August 2022 after being mauled by a pack of dogs owned by Abel Wira, whose property Thomson was staying at1.
  • Elizabeth Whittaker was killed in October 2023 in Moerewa, Northland, in her backyard by dogs owned by another resident at the property2.
  • Timothy Tu’uaki Rolleston-Bryan, a four-year-old boy, died in March 2025 following an attack on a Katikati property3.
  • Mihiata Te Rore died following an attack by three dogs while visiting a property in Kaihu, Northland, in February 20264.

Recent media reports have drawn attention to dog attacks on other animals: from packs of roaming dogs killing sheep and calves in Northland5, to the killing of dozens of pets in an Auckland suburb6. Blind Low Vision NZ is no longer placing guide dogs in certain South Auckland areas due to the high rates of dog attacks on guide dogs and their handlers7. Residents in South Auckland communities report living in fear8, with elderly residents afraid to leave their homes, and children missing school for fear of encountering roaming aggressive dogs on their way to school, or within school grounds9.

The Dog Control Act 199610 defines the obligations of dog owners, which include registering their dog, controlling their dog at all times, and ensuring their dog “does not injure, endanger, intimidate, or otherwise cause distress to any person.” The Act also lays out the functions, duties, and powers of territorial authorities, whose responsibilities include minimising the dangers presented by dogs in the community and ensuring the public can “use streets and public amenities without fear of attack or intimidation by dogs.” Auckland Council’s approach to dog control is set out in it’s Dog Management Bylaw11 and Policy on Dogs12. Auckland Council’s Animal Management division has around 150 permanent staff, including five area-based field teams (Central, East, North, South and West), a regional Barking and Registration team, a Proactive team, four animal shelters (Henderson, Manukau, Silverdale, and Pukekohe), a Veterinary Services team, and management, legal, and operational support staff.

Territorial authorities are required to collect and publish data relating to dog control policies and practices. Auckland Council’s Animal Management division publishes a high-level summary of selected data in it’s annual reports. I made a request under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 198713 on 20 November 2025 for the full dataset, which was fulfilled on 18 December 2025 (request #8140017948). The raw data is available as an R package called akldogs14, and the data is also available as cleaned .csv files in the package’s GitHub repository. I also compiled data from Auckland Council Animal Management annual reports going back to FY2016, and this data can be found here. Below is an exploration of both data sources to understand Auckland’s dog population and it’s management. All years are financial years (1 July prev - 30 June current).

3 Auckland Dog Population

There were 131,123 known dogs in the Auckland region as at 2025. As the dog population has increased, rates of registration and desexing have fallen. The proportion of dogs classified as ‘menacing’ under the Dog Control Act 1996, either due to their breed or behaviour, has doubled since 2016 to 1 in 20 dogs. A drop in the recorded dog population in 2018 was due to the removal of duplicate entries in the Auckland Council dog database, and in 2025 was due to the updating of the database during a registration campaign.

Year Known Dogs Pop. Change Registered Desexed Menacing
2025 131,123 -3.4% 88.4% 65.0% 5.1%
2024 135,546 2.8% 83.6% 66.4% 4.7%
2023 131,795 5.1% 88.2% 68.2% 4.1%
2022 125,016 5.2% 91.0% 50.7% 4.3%
2021 118,552 5.1% 94.8% 73.4% 4.1%
2020 112,530 1.4% 94.4% NA 4.2%
2019 110,969 0.9% 96.1% NA 4.0%
2018 110,012 -5.0% 93.6% NA 3.9%
2017 115,544 0.9% 83.7% NA 3.6%
2016 114,519 4.1% 93.2% NA 2.4%
2015 109,840 4.3% 91.2% NA 2.7%
2014 105,095 NA 95.9% NA 0.7%
Table 1: Source: Auckland Council Animal Management data.

Over 200 breeds are represented in the Auckland dog population. Labrador Retrievers remain the most popular, accounting for 11% of dogs in Auckland, with the top 10 also including the Staffordshire Bull Terrier and American Pit Bull Terrier, both automatically classified as ‘menacing’ under the Dog Control Act 1996.

Breed Count Proportion
Labrador Retriever 14,959 11.4%
Staffordshire Bull Terrier 8,474 6.5%
Border Collie 6,170 4.7%
Miniature Schnauzer 4,900 3.7%
Cavalier King Charles Spaniel 4,784 3.6%
Golden Retriever 4,636 3.5%
Shih Tzu 4,216 3.2%
German Shepherd 4,196 3.2%
American Pit Bull Terrier 3,908 3.0%
Jack Russell Terrier 3,641 2.8%
Table 2: Source: Auckland Council Animal Management data.

4 Dog Attacks

The rate of dog attacks have almost doubled since 2016, from 6 attacks for every 1,000 dogs, to 10 attacks for every 1,000 dogs in 2025.

When Auckland Council Animal Management officers impound a dog because it has attacked a person, the attack severity is measured on a scale from 0 to 5. In all impounds for attacks in 2024 (the most recent year for the full impound data), Pit Bull Terriers or Staffordshire Terriers were responsible for the highest or second highest numbers of attacks in each severity category.

5 Impounds

The rate of impounds per 1,000 dogs in the population reached 77.9 in 2025, the highest ever.

Year Known Dogs Impounded Dogs Impound Rate
2025 131,123 10,214 77.9
2024 135,546 8,306 61.3
2023 131,795 6,596 50.0
2022 125,016 5,012 40.1
2021 118,552 5,228 44.1
2020 112,530 5,492 48.8
2019 110,969 6,833 61.6
2018 110,012 7,457 67.8
2017 115,544 8,416 72.8
2016 114,519 8,614 75.2
2015 109,840 9,432 85.9
2014 105,095 7,373 70.2
Table 3: Source: Auckland Council Animal Management data.

The rate of impounds differed markedly by breed, with a 3 times difference even within the top 10.

Breed Impounds Population Impound Rate
Mastiff 486 1,526 318.5
Staffordshire Bull Terrier 1,972 8,474 232.7
Shar Pei 494 2,445 202.0
American Bulldog 285 1,707 167.0
American Staffordshire Terrier 336 2,297 146.3
Bearded Collie 91 673 135.2
Siberian Husky 149 1,330 112.0
Catahoula Leopard 24 228 105.3
Neapolitan Mastiff 29 293 99.0
Huntaway 300 3,191 94.0
Table 4: Source: Auckland Council Animal Management data.

The proportion of impounded dogs that were euthanised was steadily dropping between 2014 and 2021, when it reached a low of 21.7%. However, since then it has climbed steadily to 60.8% in 2025.

Most uncollected dogs were euthanised because they failed a temperament test (50.1%), and were therefore unsuitable for adoption. But a quarter of euthanised dogs were put down because the animal shelter was full.

Some dog breeds were significantly over-represented in euthanised dogs compared to the overall dog population. For example, Staffordshire Bull Terriers made up just over 6% of the dog population in 2024, but accounted for just over 30% of euthanised dogs in animal shelters. On the other hand, breeds like Labrador Retrievers were under-represented, making up just over 11% of the population but accounting for under 8% of euthanised dogs.

The number of infringements issued by Animal Management officers under the Dog Control Act 1996 tripled between 2024 and 2025, from 6,387 to 17,430. The majority were issued for failing to register a dog. Despite this, the number of prosecutions and appeals brought by Animal Management has dropped from around 197 in 2016 to 141 in 2025.

6 Regional Statistics

Auckland’s 21 Local Boards can be grouped into 5 regions (North, South, East, West, and Central).

Figure 1: Left: Auckland regions (North = blue, West = red, Central = green, East = orange, South = purple). Right: Auckland’s 21 Local Boards, coloured based on their parent region.

Most known dogs are found in the north, and the fewest are in the east.

Region Dogs People Dogs Per 1,000 People
North 43,051 425,487 101.18053
South 33,754 421,050 80.16625
Central 25,368 396,423 63.99225
West 20,046 259,950 77.11483
East 8,904 153,570 57.98007
Table 5: Source: Auckland Council Animal Management data.

Between 2021 and 2025, all Local Board areas experienced an increase in their dog population. While the median increase was 9%, Māngere-Ōtāhuhu and Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Boards had significantly higher growth based on an analysis of the interquartile range.

Local Board 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Change
Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board Area 3,407 3,677 4,173 4,670 4,809 41.2%
Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Board Area 3,912 4,267 4,668 5,107 5,192 32.7%
Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board Area 4,540 4,882 5,226 5,514 5,484 20.8%
Aotea/Great Barrier Local Board Area 295 301 325 341 349 18.3%
Manurewa Local Board Area 5,043 5,306 5,589 5,923 5,808 15.2%
Henderson-Massey Local Board Area 9,140 9,514 10,067 10,440 10,288 12.6%
Upper Harbour Local Board Area 4,880 5,307 5,607 5,696 5,464 12.0%
Puketāpapa Local Board Area 1,954 2,080 2,227 2,282 2,180 11.6%
Whau Local Board Area 3,337 3,493 3,690 3,817 3,694 10.7%
Hibiscus and Bays Local Board Area 11,369 12,035 12,621 12,994 12,529 10.2%
Kaipātiki Local Board Area 5,753 6,088 6,458 6,534 6,275 9.1%
Albert-Eden Local Board Area 5,726 6,128 6,427 6,498 6,233 8.9%
Howick Local Board Area 8,228 8,672 9,145 9,275 8,904 8.2%
Waitematā Local Board Area 4,014 4,295 4,462 4,554 4,310 7.4%
Papakura Local Board Area 5,565 5,859 6,091 6,281 5,967 7.2%
Devonport-Takapuna Local Board Area 4,290 4,423 4,720 4,799 4,592 7.0%
Franklin Local Board Area 11,218 11,879 12,426 12,560 11,978 6.8%
Waitākere Ranges Local Board Area 5,729 5,961 6,211 6,302 6,064 5.8%
Ōrākei Local Board Area 6,810 7,096 7,403 7,516 7,161 5.2%
Rodney Local Board Area 12,152 12,555 12,976 13,245 12,635 4.0%
Waiheke Local Board Area 1,180 1,200 1,271 1,272 1,207 2.3%
Table 6: Source: Auckland Council Animal Management data.

Local Board areas differed greatly on rates of registration, desexing, dogs classified as menacing or dangerous, and the proportion of owners with a Responsible Dog Owner Licence.

A Spearman rank correlation analysis showed that Local Boards with high current registrations tended to have higher rates of desexing and lower rates of classified animals, while those with higher rates of classifications tended to have lower rates of desexing.

Local Boards differed in rates of desexing and classified dogs.

A Chi-squared test revealed which dog breeds were over represented in each region, providing a snapshot of each region’s unique breed profile.

Local Boards differed greatly in the rate of dog attacks, impounds, and euthanasia of impounded dogs.

7 Action

The government announced a review of the Dog Control Act 1996 in March 202615. A number of professional and advocacy organisations have previously issued position statements and called for urgent policy reform to address the growing issue of dog control in New Zealand. All are united in their desire that dog control policy be evidence-based and preventative in nature. The New Zealand Veterinary Association16 has called for

a comprehensive plan delivered across multiple agencies that work together to address each factor. These agencies [would] include local and central government, animal control personnel, the veterinary profession, the medical profession, dog trainers and behaviourists, educators, dog breeders, dog welfare agencies and the media.

The New Zealand SPCA has issued position statements on dog safety17 and breed-specific legislation18, while the Paediatric Society of New Zealand19 is concerned about the disproportionate impact of dog attacks on children. A number of academic studies and reviews have also investigated dog control in New Zealand20,2023.

Major recommendations include:

  • The application of kaupapa Māori approaches in the development and implementation of dog control strategies to ensure solutions are grounded in tikanga and reflect local aspirations.

  • The treatment of dog ownership as a privelege instead of a right, with a corresponding set of responsibilities reinforced through compulsory owner licensing and education.

  • The compulsory registration, desexing, and microchipping of all dogs.

  • The removal of breed-specific legislation due to a lack of evidence that breed is the largest contributing factor to dog bite events, that determining breed by appearance is unreliable, that it has failed to work overseas, and that it does not promote responsible dog ownership.

  • The introduction of a revised classification system based on behaviour instead of breed, which takes into account the context in whcih the aggressive behaviour ocurred, and which places increasingly stringent conditions on the dog and owner, while also providing a pathway for rehabilitation and the removal of the classification.

  • The regulation of breeding through a permit system administered by territorial authorities to recognise that breeding feeds directly into supply, and an oversupply of dog leads to overflowing shelters and roaming.

  • The introduction of targeted education programmes to first-time dog owners, owners whose dog has displayed aggresion or has attacked a person, and in areas with high incidences of dog attacks and roaming, delivered by a combination of dog breeders, veterniary clinics, and territorial authorities.

  • The resourcing of enforcement mechanisms to properly deal with irresponsible owners and their dogs within a consistent nation-wide framework, including supporting Animal Management Officers with the budgets, training, and powers they need to do their jobs properly.

  • The introduction of compulsory nation-wide notification of dog bites or dog-related injuries to the Territorial Authority in which the incident occurred.

  • The amendment of legislation to require that dogs are properly fenced or constrained on their property to prevent roaming and attacks, especially on children, the elderly, disabled, and other vulnerable groups.

  • The introduction of standardised data collection and reporting at the level of territorial authorities, which feeds into a national database of dog-related injuries, to better track trends and identify where interventions may be most effective.

  • The funding and conducting of research into interventions which reduce the incidence of dog-related injuries, especially in children.

8 References

1.
Anonymous. Far north man abel wira found guilty of manslaughter after dogs maul neville thomson to death. RNZ. Published online August 26, 2025. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/571133/far-north-man-abel-wira-found-guilty-of-manslaughter-after-dogs-maul-neville-thomson-to-death
2.
Anonymous. Well-known and loved northland woman to be farewelled after fatal dog attack. RNZ. Published online October 16, 2023. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/500293/well-known-and-loved-northland-woman-to-be-farewelled-after-fatal-dog-attack
3.
Anonymous. Woman charged after dog kills 4-year-old. RNZ. Published online March 9, 2026. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/589066/woman-charged-after-dog-kills-4-year-old
4.
Anonymous. Woman killed by dogs in kaihu named as mihiata te rore. Published online February 18, 2026. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/587195/woman-killed-by-dogs-in-kaihu-named-as-mihiata-te-rore
5.
Anonymous. Killer dogs driving northland farmers from owning sheep. RNZ. Published online September 19, 2022. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/country/475078/killer-dogs-driving-northland-farmers-from-owning-sheep
6.
Walton F, reporter. Roaming dogs kill up to 30 cats in one suburb as residents live in fear. RNZ. Published online April 9, 2024. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/513774/roaming-dogs-kill-up-to-30-cats-in-one-suburb-as-residents-live-in-fear
7.
Anonymous. Attacks on guide dogs leave animals too anxious to work. RNZ. Published online December 16, 2025. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/581994/attacks-on-guide-dogs-leave-animals-too-anxious-to-work
8.
Afemata TM. ’Im so scared’: Crack down on roaming dogs as residents live in fear. Pacific Media Network. Published online February 26, 2025. https://pmn.co.nz/read/news/i-m-so-scared-crack-down-on-roaming-dogs-as-residents-live-in-fear
9.
Paddy Gower. Causing truancy: Children too afraid to walk to school because of dangerous dogs | stuff. Stuffconz. Published online September 10, 2025. https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360818146/causing-truancy-children-too-afraid-walk-school-because-dangerous-dogs
10.
Department of Internal Affairs. Dog control act 1996. Published online May 2, 1996. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1996/0013/latest/whole.html#DLM374410
11.
Auckland Council. Dog management bylaw 2019. Published online 2025.
12.
13.
Department of Internal Affairs. Local government official information and meetings act 1987. Published online 1987. https://www.legislation.govt.nz
14.
Saunders TE. Akldogs: Dog control data from auckland council. Published online March 12, 2026. https://tesaunders.github.io/akldogs/
15.
Anonymous. Government orders review of dog control act. Published online March 21, 2026. https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/government-orders-review-dog-control-act
16.
New Zealand Veterinary Association. Position statement: Safe dogs. Published online November 2019. https://nzva.org.nz/positions-advocacy/position-statements/safe-dogs/
17.
New Zealand SPCA. Position statement: Dog safety. https://www.spca.nz/advocacy/position-statements/article/dog-safety
18.
New Zealand SPCA. Position statement: Breed specific legislation. https://www.spca.nz/advocacy/position-statements/article/breed-specific-legislation-bsl
19.
The Paediatric Society of New Zealand. Media release: High number of dog attacks concerns child health experts. Published online March 20, 2023. https://www.paediatrics.org.nz/knowledge-hub/view-resource?id=25
20.
Duncan-Sutherland N, Cunningham C, Cooper S, Boys S. An audit of dog-related injury notification practices in a new zealand public hospital. New Zealand Medical Journal. Published online 2022.
21.
Duncan-Sutherland N, Hunt M, Alatini M, Shepherd M, Kool B. Study of dog control strategies. Injury Prevention. 2023;29(3):219-226. doi:10.1136/ip-2022-044686
22.
Smith LM, Hartmann S, Munteanu AM, Dalla Villa P, Quinnell RJ, Collins LM. The effectiveness of dog population management: A systematic review. Animals. 2019;9(12):1020. doi:10.3390/ani9121020
23.
Duncan-Sutherland N. Dog-related injuries: Notification, safeguarding and bite management. Published online December 3, 2024. https://starship.org.nz/guidelines/dog-related-injuries-notification-safeguarding-and-bite-management/